Research Program / Claims / creativity-8
All matter is composed of units of consciousness and electromagnetic energy units, and these particles are non-material.
所有物质皆由意识的单位和电磁能量单位构成，这些粒子是非物质的。
Concept creativity · Domain Life Motivation and Creative Evolution · ontological claim · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status contradicted
This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.
Seth sources (book §session)
Adjudicating experiment
First establish a computable model specifying the mass, spin, interactions of the units, how they compose known particles, and at least one scattering cross-section or decay prediction differing from the standard model. Then conduct blind analysis of public collision data on the order of one million to one billion events, period 1–3 years, with independent experimental replication; exact data volume can only be determined by predicted effect size and detection efficiency. If no observable difference is specified, no experiment currently exists to adjudicate the 'non-material essence,' and arbitrary sample sizes are meaningless.
Suggested paper title
Testing a Quantitative Constituent Model of Matter Against Precision Scattering and Decay Data
What it would overturn
If the alternative theory both reproduces existing precise results and validates unique predictions, it would revise the hypothesis that quarks, leptons, and their quantum field interactions suffice to describe ordinary matter composition at tested scales.
Candidate labs / funders
Particle Data Group; ATLAS Collaboration; CMS Collaboration
Specificity of Seth's formulation
No particle quantum numbers, dynamical equations, or computable predictions provided, far less specific than the standard model; renaming known quantum fields as consciousness units produces no new evidence.
Note
Contradicted applies if taken as a literal physical proposition replacing matter composition and interactions; if it is merely a metaphysical renaming of identical physical results, it should be classified as untested; quantum fields being non-classical entities does not mean they are non-physical or conscious.
Evidence (1, DOI-verified via Crossref)
Cite: Future Mind Institute, Seth Material Research Agenda, claim creativity-8, https://www.seth.org.cn/en/research/claims/creativity-8