Research Program / Claims / mediumship-2
As a medium, one may potentially contact deceased friends and relatives, but the ability must be explored through trial and error, as it varies by individual.
作为灵媒,可能得以接触已故亲友,但能力需通过试错来探索,因个体差异而不同。
Concept mediumship · Domain Trans-Lifetime Personality and Consciousness Continuity · ontological claim · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status contested · ★ fundable
This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.
- Anomalous information reception by mediums: A meta-analysis of the scientific evidence — Matthew Sarraf; Michael A. Woodley of Menie; Patrizio Tressoldi (2021), EXPLORE纳入14篇论文、18项实验,报告总体高于随机的结果;这是准确性证据,不能独立确定信息来自亡者。[论文](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.04.002)
- Mediumship accuracy: A quantitative and qualitative study with a triple-blind protocol — Patrizio Tressoldi; Laura Liberale; Fernando Sinesio; Valdimiro Bubba; Luciano Pederzoli; Ines Testoni (2022), EXPLORE9名灵媒提供38次解读,目标解读辨认率为65.8%,高于50%机会水平;规模小,来源解释仍不唯一。[论文](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2021.05.009)
- Testing alleged mediumistic writing: An experimental controlled study — Elizabeth Schmitt Freire; Alexandre Caroli Rocha; Victor Scio Tasca; Mateus Moreira Marnet; Alexander Moreira-Almeida (2022), EXPLORE8名灵媒参与的盲控自动书写实验未发现目标信件比对照信件更准确,为相关阴性证据。[论文](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.08.017)
Cite: Future Mind Institute, Seth Material Research Agenda, claim mediumship-2, https://www.seth.org.cn/en/research/claims/mediumship-2