Research Program / Claims / personal-reality-11

Units of consciousness can appear in multiple places simultaneously and do not pass through space, just as an electron moves from one orbit to another without traversing the space between them.

意识单位能同时出现在多处、不经过空间,如同电子从一个轨道到另一个轨道而不穿越其间空间。

Concept personal reality · Domain Belief Dynamics and Mind–Body Regulation · ontological claim · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status untested · ★ fundable

This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.

Seth sources (book §session)
Adjudicating experiment
First, detectable markers and identity criteria must be provided for units of consciousness, otherwise simultaneous multiple presence cannot be adjudicated. A weaker proxy test is that approximately 100 skilled participants each complete 200 trials of synchronous four-choice target identification at two distant sites, with independent randomization, strict timing, blinded recording, and pre-registered joint hit rate, over 12 months; even if successful, it would only indicate anomalous information access, not that the same unit of consciousness is in two places or did not pass through space.
Suggested paper title
Joint Identification of Spatially Separated Random Targets Under Blinded Conditions
What it would overturn
If it were further proven that controllable information is transmitted between spacelike-separated events, it would challenge relativistic local causal constraints, but multiple subjective experiences alone do not have this implication.
Candidate labs / funders
Institute of Noetic Sciences,IONS X研究项目; Olaf Blanke,École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne,Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience
Specificity of Seth's formulation
'Multiple places simultaneously' and 'not passing through space' are superficially specific, but without unit identification methods, spatiotemporal resolution, or information reading rules, they cannot be distinguished from imagination, attentional allocation, or self-location illusions.
Note
Electron orbits are a quantum state concept, not classical planetary orbits; the cited artificial atom experiment cannot be generalized to spatial trajectory conclusions for all electron transitions, so the quantum analogy can neither confirm units of consciousness nor be used to claim that it has been directly falsified.
Evidence (1, DOI-verified via Crossref)
  • To catch and reverse a quantum jump mid-flight — Zlatko K. Minev, Shantanu O. Mundhada, Shyam Shankar, Philip Reinhold, Ricardo Gutiérrez-Jáuregui, Robert J. Schoelkopf, Mazyar Mirrahimi, Howard J. Carmichael, Michel H. Devoret (2019), Nature
    类比约束:受连续监测的人工原子跃迁可呈现可追踪、可逆转的条件演化;研究没有涉及意识单位,也不支持将跃迁理解为意识跨空间移动。[论文](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1287-z)

Cite: Future Mind Institute, Seth Material Research Agenda, claim personal-reality-11, https://www.seth.org.cn/en/research/claims/personal-reality-11