Research Program / Claims / precognition-3

The mechanism of precognition is a time-reversal system: time curls inward and explodes outward; the past can be changed, and present events can also change the past.

预知的机制是时间倒转系统：时间向内卷曲并向外爆炸，过去可改变，现在事件也能改变过去。

Concept precognition · Domain Nonlinear Time and Self-Cognition · mechanism · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status contradicted

This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.

Seth sources (book §session)
Adjudicating experiment
Corresponding to supplementary question 5: approximately 600 participants first make predictions and copy the original reports to independent append-only storage; then random targets are presented; subsequently they are randomly assigned to three groups: misleading suggestion, accurate reminder, or no suggestion. After 24 hours and one week, they restate the predictions; blinded raters compare original hit rates, restatement hit rates, and memory confidence over 6 months. If only restatement changes, it supports memory reconstruction; testing physical past change would require independent physical intervention and record-integrity experiments, which this memory experiment cannot adjudicate.
Suggested paper title
Post-event Suggestion Alters Recalled Predictions: A Randomized Test Using Time-stamped Original Reports
What it would overturn
If present intervention actually changes past physical events, it would overturn the causal hypothesis that controllable macroscopic intervention cannot send information to completed events and rewrite their history.
Candidate labs / funders
Kimberley A. Wade，University of Warwick，错误记忆; Jan Walleczek，Phenoscience Laboratories，逆因果相关实验与方法
Specificity of Seth's formulation
'Curls inward, explodes outward' lacks equations, scales, or conservation relations and cannot be compared with specific physical models; the testable part is only whether subsequent intervention affects previous records.
Note
'contradicted' refers to the conflict of the literal version of controllably rewriting the macroscopic past with existing causal frameworks; it does not claim that all time-symmetric or retrocausal explanations have been ruled out; quantum delayed choice also does not equate to rewriting recorded history.
Evidence (2, DOI-verified via Crossref)

Cite: Future Mind Institute, Seth Material Research Agenda, claim precognition-3, https://www.seth.org.cn/en/research/claims/precognition-3