When writing predictions, usually there is no emotional feeling; occasionally there is a conscious sense of certainty but the prediction is often invalid; non-spontaneous premonitions are often accompanied by strong emotions and certainty.

写下预测时通常不会有情绪感觉；偶尔有意识确定感时预测往往无效；非自发产生的预兆常伴随强烈情绪与确定感。

Concept emotions · Domain Belief Dynamics and Mind–Body Regulation · testable prediction · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status untested · ★ fundable

This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.

Seth sources (book §session)

esp-power §10

Adjudicating experiment

Implemented jointly with the emotions-7 cohort: approximately 500 participants are tracked for 6 months. At each prediction, emotional intensity, confidence, and reaction time are recorded, and, before outcome revelation, whether the prediction was spontaneous or prompted. In addition, random assignment of first-reaction versus deliberate-thinking conditions is added. Targets must be generated after predictions are locked, with blinded scoring. The primary test is the slope of confidence × objective hit rate and the interaction with generation mode, with clear pre-definitions of no emotion, certainty, and invalidity. If strongly confident records are too few, the sample is expanded according to pre-registered rules, not by post-hoc threshold changes.