Research Program / Claims / psychometry-12

Although psychometric information contains many specific details, it cannot be guaranteed that all details correspond to the object; subsequent analysis and experimental verification are needed.

感应信息中虽有大量具体细节，但无法保证所有细节都对应物体，需配合后续分析和实验验证。

Concept psychometry · Domain Extended Perception and Consciousness Transduction · mechanism · interface 3/3 · testability 3/3 · status supported

This program treats the Seth Material as a source of hypotheses, not as doctrine to be validated. Lead dossiers are AI-compiled from the corpus with a book-and-session citation after every statement; literature reviews are AI web-search summaries whose references were all DOI-verified against Crossref; the agenda draft is an AI synthesis. None of it is Seth's original text, and none of it represents scientific consensus. English fields are machine-translated; the Chinese text is authoritative.

Seth sources (book §session)
Adjudicating experiment
Establish a three-laboratory report–object dataset with approximately 300 participants, each doing 20 rounds over 9–12 months. Pre-specify the target pool, all reports, scoring criteria, and exclusion rules; decompose reports into verifiable propositions, retaining correct, erroneous, contradictory, and undecidable content. Training set is used to develop screening rules; the confirmation set is analyzed only once with a frozen analysis; primary endpoint is the recognition advantage of the full report for the true target over decoys, secondary endpoint is the relationship between detail precision and quantity. Subsequently replicate with new objects in independent laboratories.
Suggested paper title
Detail Density and Verification Accuracy in Blinded Object-Associated Reports: A Multi-Laboratory Registered Study
What it would overturn
'Many details do not guarantee correctness; independent verification is required' does not overturn mainstream assumptions; only if a frozen analysis stably exceeds chance levels on new targets would this challenge the model that ordinary information channels sufficiently explain reports.
Candidate labs / funders
Christine Anne Simmonds-Moore，西佐治亚大学; Beatrice G. Kuhlmann，曼海姆大学; Zoltan Kekecs，透明重复研究项目研究者
Specificity of Seth's formulation
This is a reasonable but general methodological principle, not a Seth-specific quantitative prediction; genuine specificity would require specifying beforehand which details should be correct and which can be excluded.
Note
'Supported' applies only to the necessity of verification and the point that details do not guarantee truth; the overall literature has not yet established a replicable anomalous object-information mechanism for these twelve claims, and a single significant result does not suffice to directly overturn mainstream theory.
Evidence (2, DOI-verified via Crossref)

Cite: Future Mind Institute, Seth Material Research Agenda, claim psychometry-12, https://www.seth.org.cn/en/research/claims/psychometry-12